Having an explicit I2C model object will help if one day we want to
add I2C devices on the bus from the machine init routine.
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
[balaton: Symplify sysbus device casts for readibility]
Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan <balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Message-Id: <68eb8b5ac408ca8cc981ebf53a3e154c0d34c7f6.1660746880.git.balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Make ppc-uic a subclass of ppc4xx-dcr-device which will handle the cpu
link and make it uniform with the other PPC4xx devices.
Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan <balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <eb548130cf60aea8a6ea4dba4dee1686b3cabc3d.1660746880.git.balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
This device is shared between different 4xx socs.
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan <balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Message-Id: <63d9b14c8ff5f73e35bffca1036394b5235735ee.1660746880.git.balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
The EBC is shared between 405 and 440 so move it to shared file.
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan <balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Message-Id: <10eae70509ca4bd74858fc2c0a0f0e4eb9330199.1660746880.git.balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
This device is shared between different 4xx socs.
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan <balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Message-Id: <5b13ebfd12a71a28035bed5a915cbeee81cf21d1.1660746880.git.balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
The PLB is shared between 405 and 440 so move it to the shared file.
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan <balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Message-Id: <2498384bf3e18959ee8cb984d72fb66b8a6ecadc.1660746880.git.balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
The Memory Access Layer (MAL) controller is currently modeled as a DCR
device with 4 IRQs. Also drop the ppc4xx_mal_init() helper and adapt
the sam460ex machine.
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
[balaton: ppc4xx_dcr_register changes, add finalize method]
Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan <balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Message-Id: <d54a243dff94d95ba30dbcc09c27700a90ade932.1660746880.git.balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
PLB is currently modeled as a simple DCR device. Also drop the
ppc4xx_plb_init() helper and adapt the sam460ex machine.
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
[balaton: ppc4xx_dcr_register changes]
Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan <balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Message-Id: <c4256d1bffca86fe1d696aa9c56732e5f563e114.1660746880.git.balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
POB is currently modeled as a simple DCR device.
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
[balaton: ppc4xx_dcr_register changes]
Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan <balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Message-Id: <2bb1a89182523059ecb0e8d20c22a293534dec17.1660746880.git.balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
The OPB arbitrer is currently modeled as a simple SysBus device with a
unique memory region.
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
[balaton: ppc4xx_dcr_register changes]
Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan <balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Message-Id: <38476bc43d2332db2f09dbede9eff5234d6ce217.1660746880.git.balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
EBC is currently modeled as a DCR device. Also drop the ppc405_ebc_init()
helper and adapt the sam460ex machine.
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
[balaton: ppc4xx_dcr_register changes]
Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan <balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Message-Id: <51a0769ab605c5158f4f2f1c896725d5fe7a073b.1660746880.git.balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
The DMA controller is currently modeled as a DCR device with a couple
of IRQs.
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
[balaton: ppc4xx_dcr_register changes]
Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan <balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Message-Id: <4738b3c7cf18c328f05aaaddc555a46219431335.1660746880.git.balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
The GPIO controller is currently modeled as a simple SysBus device
with a unique memory region.
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
[balaton: Simplify sysbus device casts for readability]
Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan <balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Message-Id: <e95d7849f3768e1f9a2846c4b282392750678b3e.1660746880.git.balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
The OCM controller is currently modeled as a simple DCR device with
a couple of memory regions.
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
[balaton: ppc4xx_dcr_register changes]
Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan <balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Message-Id: <ecb93d2d5993bb7a970365744c7d342d4abcb017.1660746880.git.balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
The GPT controller is currently modeled as a SysBus device with a
unique memory region, a couple of IRQs and a timer.
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
[balaton: ppc4xx_dcr_register changes, add finalize method]
Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan <balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Message-Id: <8950ab26e78173f94ba65bc61bcfd0631de1fe61.1660746880.git.balaton@eik.bme.hu>
[danielhb: check if timer != NULL in ppc405_gpt_finalize()]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
The CPC controller is currently modeled as a DCR device.
Now that all clock settings are handled at the CPC level, change the
SoC "sys-clk" property to be an alias on the same property in the CPC
model.
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
[balaton: ppc4xx_dcr_register changes]
Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan <balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Message-Id: <23393cb91a2c6c560a4461b3e9d1baa48ae28f74.1660746880.git.balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
The Device Control Registers (DCR) of on-SoC devices are accessed by
software through the use of the mtdcr and mfdcr instructions. These
are converted in transactions on a side band bus, the DCR bus, which
connects the on-SoC devices to the CPU.
Ideally, we should model these accesses with a DCR namespace and DCR
memory regions but today the DCR handlers are installed in a DCR table
under the CPU. Instead, introduce a little device model wrapper to hold
a CPU link and handle registration of DCR handlers.
The DCR device inherits from SysBus because most of these devices also
have MMIO regions and/or IRQs. Being a SysBusDevice makes things easier
to install the device model in the overall SoC.
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
[balaton: Explicit opaque parameter for dcr callbacks]
Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan <balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Message-Id: <9b21bdf55e0a728f093bad299e030d98f302ded0.1660746880.git.balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Drop the use of ppc4xx_init() and duplicate a bit of code related to
clocks in the SoC realize routine. We will clean that up in the
following patches.
ppc_dcr_init() simply allocates default DCR handlers for the CPU. Maybe
this could be done in model initializer of the CPU families needing it.
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: BALATON Zoltan <balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Message-Id: <20220809153904.485018-8-clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
This moves all the code previously done in the ppc405ep_init() routine
under ppc405_soc_realize(). We can also adjust the number of banks now
that we have control on ppc4xx_sdram_init().
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: BALATON Zoltan <balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Message-Id: <20220809153904.485018-7-clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
It is an initial model to start QOMification of the PPC405 board.
QOM'ified devices will be reintroduced one by one. Start with the
memory regions, which name prefix is changed to "ppc405".
Also, initialize only one RAM bank. The second bank is a dummy one
(zero size) which is here to match the hard coded number of banks in
ppc405ep_init().
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: BALATON Zoltan <balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Message-Id: <20220809153904.485018-6-clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
It doesn't belong to the generic machine nor the SoC. Fix a typo in
the name while we are at it.
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: BALATON Zoltan <balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Message-Id: <20220809153904.485018-5-clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
We will use this machine as a base to define the ref405ep and possibly
the PPC405 hotfoot board as found in the Linux kernel.
Reviewed-by: BALATON Zoltan <balaton@eik.bme.hu>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <20220809153904.485018-3-clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
It has been deprecated since 7.0.
Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <20220809153904.485018-2-clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
User creatable root ports are being parented by the 'peripheral' or the
'peripheral-anon' container. This happens because this is the regular
QOM schema for sysbus devices that are added via the command line.
Let's make this QOM hierarchy similar to what we have with default root
ports, i.e. the root port must be parented by the pnv-root-bus. To do
that we change the qom and bus parent of the root port during
root_port_realize(). The realize() is shared by the default root port
code path, so we can remove the code inside pnv_phb_attach_root_port()
that was adding the root port as a child of the bus as well.
After all that, remove pnv_phb_attach_root_port() and create the root
port explictly in the 'default_enabled()' case of pnv_phb_realize().
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220819094748.400578-3-danielhb413@gmail.com>
We have 2 helpers that amends the QOM and parent bus of a given object,
repectively. These 2 helpers are called together, and not by accident.
Due to QOM internals, doing an object_unparent() will result in the
device being removed from its parent bus. This means that changing the
QOM parent requires reassigning the parent bus again.
Create a single helper called pnv_parent_fixup(), documenting some of
the QOM specifics that we're dealing with the unparenting/parenting
mechanics, and handle both the QOM and the parent bus assignment.
Next patch will make use of this function to handle a case where we need
to change the QOM parent while keeping the same parent bus assigned
beforehand.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220819094748.400578-2-danielhb413@gmail.com>
Given that powernv9 and powernv10 uses the same pnv-phb backend, the
logic to allow user created pnv-phbs for powernv10 is already in place.
Let's flip the switch.
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220811163950.578927-11-danielhb413@gmail.com>
The function assumes that we're always dealing with a PNV9_CHIP()
object. This is not the case when the pnv-phb device belongs to a
powernv10 machine.
Change pnv_phb4_get_pec() to be able to work with PNV10_CHIP() if
necessary.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220811163950.578927-10-danielhb413@gmail.com>
Enable pnv-phb user created devices for powernv9 now that we have
everything in place.
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220811163950.578927-9-danielhb413@gmail.com>
The PHB4 backend relies on a link with the corresponding PEC element.
This is trivial to do during machine_init() time for default devices,
but not so much for user created ones.
pnv_phb4_get_pec() is a small variation of the function that was
reverted by commit 9c10d86fee "ppc/pnv: Remove user-created PHB{3,4,5}
devices". We'll use it to determine the appropriate PEC for a given user
created pnv-phb that uses a PHB4 backend.
This is done during realize() time, in pnv_phb_user_device_init().
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220811163950.578927-8-danielhb413@gmail.com>
The bulk of the work was already done by previous patches.
Use defaults_enabled() to determine whether we need to create the
default devices or not.
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220811163950.578927-7-danielhb413@gmail.com>
When enabling user created PHBs (a change reverted by commit 9c10d86fee)
we were handling PHBs created by default versus by the user in different
manners. The only difference between these PHBs is that one will have a
valid phb3->chip that is assigned during pnv_chip_power8_realize(),
while the user created needs to search which chip it belongs to.
Aside from that there shouldn't be any difference. Making the default
PHBs behave in line with the user created ones will make it easier to
re-introduce them later on. It will also make the code easier to follow
since we are dealing with them in equal manner.
The first step is to turn chip8->phbs[] into a PnvPHB3 pointer array.
This will allow us to assign user created PHBs into it later on. The way
we initilize the default case is now more in line with that would happen
with the user created case: the object is created, parented by the chip
because pnv_xscom_dt() relies on it, and then assigned to the array.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220811163950.578927-6-danielhb413@gmail.com>
pnv_parent_qom_fixup() and pnv_parent_bus_fixup() are versions of the
helpers that were reverted by commit 9c10d86fee "ppc/pnv: Remove
user-created PHB{3,4,5} devices". They are needed to amend the QOM and
bus hierarchies of user created pnv-phbs, matching them with default
pnv-phbs.
A new helper pnv_phb_user_device_init() is created to handle
user-created devices setup. We're going to call it inside
pnv_phb_realize() in case we're realizing an user created device. This
will centralize all user device realated in a single spot, leaving the
realize functions of the phb3/phb4 backends untouched.
Another helper called pnv_chip_add_phb() was added to handle the
particularities of each chip version when adding a new PHB.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220811163950.578927-5-danielhb413@gmail.com>
For default root ports we have a way of accessing chassis and slot,
before root_port_realize(), via pnv_phb_attach_root_port(). For the
future user created root ports this won't be the case: we can't use
this helper because we don't have access to the PHB phb-id/chip-id
values.
In earlier patches we've added phb-id and chip-id to pnv-phb-root-bus
objects. We're now able to use the bus to retrieve them. The bus is
reachable for both user created and default devices, so we're changing
all the code paths. This also allow us to validate these changes with
the existing default devices.
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220811163950.578927-4-danielhb413@gmail.com>
The same rationale provided in the PHB3 bus case applies here.
Note: we could have merged both buses in a single object, like we did
with the root ports, and spare some boilerplate. The reason we opted to
preserve both buses objects is twofold:
- there's not user side advantage in doing so. Unifying the root ports
presents a clear user QOL change when we enable user created devices back.
The buses objects, aside from having a different QOM name, is transparent
to the user;
- we leave a door opened in case we want to increase the root port limit
for phb4/5 later on without having to deal with phb3 code.
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220811163950.578927-3-danielhb413@gmail.com>
We rely on the phb-id and chip-id, which are PHB properties, to assign
chassis and slot to the root port. For default devices this is no big
deal: the root port is being created under pnv_phb_realize() and the
values are being passed on via the 'index' and 'chip-id' of the
pnv_phb_attach_root_port() helper.
If we want to implement user created root ports we have a problem. The
user created root port will not be aware of which PHB it belongs to,
unless we're willing to violate QOM best practices and access the PHB
via dev->parent_bus->parent. What we can do is to access the root bus
parent bus.
Since we're already assigning the root port as QOM child of the bus, and
the bus is initiated using PHB properties, let's add phb-id and chip-id
as properties of the bus. This will allow us trivial access to them, for
both user-created and default root ports, without doing anything too
shady with QOM.
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220811163950.578927-2-danielhb413@gmail.com>
The helper is only used in this file.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220624084921.399219-13-danielhb413@gmail.com>
The attribute is unused.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220624084921.399219-11-danielhb413@gmail.com>
We support only a single root port, PNV_PHB_ROOT_PORT.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220624084921.399219-10-danielhb413@gmail.com>
The unified pnv-phb-root-port can be used instead. The phb4-root-port
device isn't exposed to the user in any official QEMU release so there's
no ABI breakage in removing it.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220624084921.399219-9-danielhb413@gmail.com>
The unified pnv-phb-root-port can be used in its place. There is no ABI
breakage in doing so because no official QEMU release introduced user
creatable pnv-phb3-root-port devices.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220624084921.399219-8-danielhb413@gmail.com>
We have two very similar root-port devices, pnv-phb3-root-port and
pnv-phb4-root-port. Both consist of a wrapper around the PCIESlot device
that, until now, has no additional attributes.
The main difference between the PHB3 and PHB4 root ports is that
pnv-phb4-root-port has the pnv_phb4_root_port_reset() callback. All
other differences can be merged in a single device without too much
trouble.
This patch introduces the unified pnv-phb-root-port that, in time, will
be used as the default root port for the pnv-phb device.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220624084921.399219-7-danielhb413@gmail.com>
Change the parent type of the PnvPHB4 device to TYPE_PARENT since the
PCI bus is going to be initialized by the PnvPHB parent. Functions that
needs to access the bus via a PnvPHB4 object can do so via the
phb4->phb_base pointer.
pnv_phb4_pec now creates a PnvPHB object.
The powernv9 machine class will create PnvPHB devices with version '4'.
powernv10 will create using version '5'. Both are using global machine
properties in their class_init() to do that.
These changes will benefit us when adding PnvPHB user creatable devices
for powernv9 and powernv10.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220624084921.399219-6-danielhb413@gmail.com>
Similar to what we already did for the PnvPHB3 device, let's add a
helper to init the bus when using a PnvPHB4. This helper will be used by
PnvPHb when PnvPHB4 turns into a backend.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220624084921.399219-5-danielhb413@gmail.com>
We need a handful of changes that needs to be done in a single swoop to
turn PnvPHB3 into a PnvPHB backend.
In the PnvPHB3, since the PnvPHB device implements PCIExpressHost and
will hold the PCI bus, change PnvPHB3 parent to TYPE_DEVICE. There are a
couple of instances in pnv_phb3.c that needs to access the PCI bus, so a
phb_base pointer is added to allow access to the parent PnvPHB. The
PnvPHB3 root port will now be connected to a PnvPHB object.
In pnv.c, the powernv8 machine chip8 will now hold an array of PnvPHB
objects. pnv_get_phb3_child() needs to be adapted to return the PnvPHB3
backend from the PnvPHB child. A global property is added in
pnv_machine_power8_class_init() to ensure that all PnvPHBs are created
with phb->version = 3.
After all these changes we're still able to boot a powernv8 machine with
default settings. The real gain will come with user created PnvPHB
devices, coming up next.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220624084921.399219-4-danielhb413@gmail.com>
The PnvPHB device is going to be the base device for all other powernv
PHBs. It consists of a device that has the same user API as the other
PHB, namely being a PCIHostBridge and having chip-id and index
properties. It also has a 'backend' pointer that will be initialized
with the PHB implementation that the device is going to use.
The initialization of the PHB backend is done by checking the PHB
version via a 'version' attribute that can be set via a global machine
property. The 'version' field will be used to make adjustments based on
the running version, e.g. PHB3 uses a 'chip' reference while PHB4 uses
'pec'. To init the PnvPHB bus we'll rely on helpers for each version.
The version 3 helper is already added (pnv_phb3_bus_init), the PHB4
helper will be added later on.
For now let's add the basic logic of the PnvPHB object, which consists
mostly of pnv_phb_realize() doing all the work of checking the
phb->version set, initializing the proper backend, passing through its
attributes to the chosen backend, finalizing the backend realize and
adding a root port in the end.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220624084921.399219-3-danielhb413@gmail.com>
The PnvPHB3 bus init consists of initializing the pci_io and pci_mmio
regions, registering it via pci_register_root_bus() and then setup the
iommu.
We'll want to init the bus from outside pnv_phb3.c when the bus is
removed from the PnvPHB3 device and put into a new parent PnvPHB device.
The new pnv_phb3_bus_init() helper will be used by the parent to init
the bus when using the PHB3 backend.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220624084921.399219-2-danielhb413@gmail.com>
